In early May, four states (Indiana, Maryland, Nebraska, and West Virginia) held their congressional primary elections, with key races, voter turnout statistics, and notable outcomes highlighting the impact of closed primaries and the push for electoral reforms to enhance voter representation.
In the first half of May, four states (Indiana, Maryland, Nebraska, and West Virginia) held their congressional primary elections. These states have a combined total of 22 congressional districts. To this point, 13 states—with a total of 190 U.S. House seats—have held their congressional primaries.
Maryland has closed primaries of these states, prohibiting nearly a million voters not registered with a major party from participating.
Indiana has nine congressional districts, and eight of them are rated “safe” by the Cook Political Report. This means that eight out of nine seats (89%) were effectively decided in the primary. Of the eight districts that were decided in dominant party primaries, seven featured two or more candidates. 490,620 people participated in those primaries—just 9% of the state’s voting-age population.
Shortly following the primary, former Gov. Mitch Daniels wrote a piece about Indiana’s Primary Problem and how few voters are determining outcomes in the state.
Three of Indiana’s congressional seats were open this cycle. All of them were in safe districts, meaning the new representatives were effectively elected in the primary.
Notably, the three open seats all had seven or eight candidates run. Further, in Indiana’s 5th Congressional District, incumbent Rep. Victoria Spartz announced in February 2023 that she would not seek reelection but then reversed her decision in February 2024. During the year in which she was not running, several candidates entered the race, resulting in the district having nine candidates on the ballot.
With so many candidates running in these decisive primaries, it was extremely likely that the winner would only need a plurality — and that’s exactly what happened in these four districts.
Maryland has eight congressional districts and all eight were rated safe, meaning that 100% of the state’s congressional seats were effectively decided in the primary. All eight districts had competitive primaries featuring two or more candidates. 679,441 people participated in those primaries, which is 14.1% of the state’s voting age population.
Maryland had three open U.S. House seats this cycle, and they all saw large numbers of candidates run.
Consequently, two of the open-seat primaries had plurality winners.
The story is similar in Nebraska and West Virginia:
West Virginia had one open seat this cycle in WV-02, and five candidates ran in the primary. Riley Moore, the state treasurer of West Virginia who endorsed Trump for president over a year ago, won with less than a majority (45%) of the vote.
Because so many elections are effectively decided in primaries, millions of eligible voters don’t have a real say in who represents them. States can address the Primary Problem by implementing reforms that put voters first, such as nonpartisan primaries. This will ensure that all voters have the right to vote for any candidate in every election—regardless of party—to establish a more representative and functional government.